Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Tuesday Newsday: Too Much History, Too Much Biography?

Note: The news industry is pretty insane right now -- but pretty fascinating, too. On Tuesdays, I'll be blogging about journalism -- how it's changing, who's shaping it, and what's next for the news. Thus, happy Tuesday Newsday, kids.



When the management of a major metropolitan daily newspaper decides to publish their Twitter accounts instead of their names on the masthead, you know something is changing.

This, if you couldn't tell, is the March 19 masthead of the venerable Chicago Tribune, one of my favorite papers and, coincidentally, one of the most troubled papers in the country right now.

So it's interesting that just a few months after its parent company declared bankruptcy, the Tribune printed a masthead devoted to one of the more pervasive aspects of new media journalism. Twitter is what you might call a "microblog," a vast aggregator of millions of people's 140-character status updates. At its worst, it's vapid, narcissistic, and completely pointless.

At its best, though, it's kind of the coolest thing ever. Wade through the masses of voyeuristic losers and you find really, really awesome journalists -- not just sitting there navel-gazing but delving in-depth into their reporting, taking you inside newsrooms across the country and around the world.

I follow way too many journalists on Twitter -- Daniel Victor from the Harrisburg Patriot-News, Chris Krewson from the Philadephia Inquirer, the adorable freelance blog queen Ana Marie Cox -- and while stalking my fellow newsies is admittedly a mildly pathetic way to spend my time, it's convinced me that Twitter isn't just for the self-absorbed yuppies that make up its majority. It's taught me that in the midst of layoffs left and right, of venerable papers collapsing like dominoes, there is a small subset of journalists who are embracing new media and making it work.

A few months ago, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill had a bomb scare on campus. Zach Tracer, a reporter for Duke's student paper, was on the scene and reporting -- but before filing a web update, he was posting everything he saw to Twitter. Watching updates come in instantly in real time was fascinating -- and yeah, it might speak to what my parents enjoy calling "the instant-gratification culture," but at the same time, it shows a remarkable willingness to adapt and innovate. Twittering the news is not going to make us any money in the short run, but maybe it's part of what will save us in the end.

1 comment:

  1. Hey, Aubrey! Just realized you were following my blog, so thus I am now following yours!

    I just discovered Twitter and ... "hmmm" was my intial reaction. Then I read the Wikipedia page, because Wikipedia knows all. And it was interesting how Twitter was used to break stories, like the attacks in Mumbai. Fascinating really. But where is the line of truth on something like Twitter? Does it hold any legitimacy? That's what plagues me. How does one discern if know Daniel Victor is actually who he says he is? Cause as much as I enjoy following Obama, I doubt his beloved Blackberry is the one posting the updates.

    ReplyDelete